- How Oregon Ruling Affects Federal Gender Care Crackdown
In a favorable development for healthcare providers, an Oregon federal court recently vacated certain U.S. Department of Health and Human Services restrictions on gender-affirming care for minors, but the government's broader campaign against this care, including proposed rulemaking and agency investigations, leaves significant uncertainty, say attorneys at Arnold & Porter.
- NCAA Insists Athletes Must Arbitrate NIL Deal, Not 'Rewrite' It
College athletes' attempt to go through the courts to exempt certain revenue streams from NCAA oversight is an end-run around the resolution they reached in last year's $2.78 billion class action settlement, the association has told a California federal judge.
- Congress Should Ax Privacy Bill For Not Shielding Consumers
The SECURE Data Act should be rejected because, despite Congress' claims, it would not meaningfully rein in data practices, but instead would weaken enforcement, eliminate stronger protections and prioritize data extraction over consumer protection and accountability, say attorneys at DiCello Levitt.
- 9th Circ. Upholds Chip Injunction In Google Contract Case
The Ninth Circuit refused to lift an injunction against Point Financial Inc. barring it from interfering with Google's license to manufacture certain computer chips while a case plays out over Google's contract with a chipmaker that went out of business.
- AI Data Center Boom May Spur Wave Of Toxic Tort Suits
Nascent litigation matters against data center operators, set against limited government regulation and a growing body of public health research, suggests we may be on the cusp of an era of mass toxic tort claims, with a liability framework firmly rooted in precedent from other industries, says Benjamin Heller at RFZ Law.
We Specialize In:
- Personal Injury
- Estate Planning
- Estate Litigation
- Trust Administration
- Civil Litigation & Trial Practice
- Business & Corporate Law
- Real Estate Law